Value selling

I think this is the question that has plagued me for the entirety of my adult, gaming life:

Can a game stand on quality of gameplay alone?

What do you think super-fans? For the longest time, I’ve been a vocal proponent of the negative. Shooters, for example, have always been the genre where I’ve found that I need a lot more. CoD, Battlefield – how many brown people can you kill before you’re just fed up? How many times can you go online, get racial slurs and curses thrown in your direction while listening to people arguing who is the bigger “noob” because their K/D ration is .1 better than the other guys?

I think this is the easiest genre to pick on. Well, other than say, sports, racing and fighting games. All those games have ever had was gameplay to stand on. And, frankly, that’s fine. It’s just one of those things.

But with shooters, if I’m going to spend a bunch of time, immersing myself into a world, I need something to sink my teeth into. Give me a Borderlands. Give me a Bioshock. In the case of the former, yeah, you need to have the same sense of humour you had when you were fifteen. That’s a given – but at least there’s something there. Some reason to keep killing bandits and bosses. The sheer thrill of the kill just isn’t enough.

The latter, the Bioshock series (excluding 2, to some extent) are some of the best games I’ve ever played. In all due deference, Bioshock 2 did have a good story on it’s own. Against the unadulterated brilliance that is Ken Levine, nothing is comparable. Yes, one is a little too Ayn Rand-y for my tastes. Even with that in mind, it’s still easily one of the best games of the last generation – and don’t get me started on Infinite.

The reason I ask this question is: when I see games like The Division or Ghost Recon: Wildlands – to me, those games look like the sort of thing that can stand on their own two legs without needing the high quality story telling that I’m used to. The level of freedom, the ability to decide what you want to do in any given situation, gives the player back the power.

I think that’s the real appeal of story heavy games. You get immersion, so long as the quality of the story is there. With games like The Division, allowing you to decide the actions of your character – whether it be to team up with those strangers, or to back-stab them at the last second to take their booty, that is real freedom. No rails. Just personal choice.

Bear this in mind, gamers, it’s still a little early to tell. Ubisoft has a bad track record of showing off stuff that looks amazing and has unprecedented levels of promise *cough* Watch Dogs *cough*. So I might end up eating these words in the next year or so. But I’m hopeful, and totally willing to give Ubisoft the benefit of the doubt, despite some severe let downs.

All I’m saying is: My view has been a bit narrow up till now. Mechanics are important, but I would have never put them ahead of anything else.

That’s not to say that all story-heavy games are good. I’m sure I’m going to make a pariah of myself by saying this, but I’ll say it anyway. Last of Us, well, it wasn’t as good as everyone made it out to be. Not to say it wasn’t great. Because it was. I just don’t think it lived up to the hype. The gameplay mechanics weren’t bad, though at times they could be pretty frustrating on the difficulty level I generally play at, but it wasn’t all mechanics that dragged the game down. There were some pretty slow parts of that story and it felt kind of disjointed at times. Ok, I’ll finish up so you can all get your pitchforks/torches ready.

– The Ego

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Value selling

  1. I believe that problem of yours can be solved with muting. I know most games don’t have the “Turn off voices” option, but at least with a headset you can turn the voice volume to zero c:

    • You’re absolutely correct. I even have a headset that can moderate the volume of chat vs game sounds. The problem, inherently, is when you’re playing some of these online games, it’s almost a necessity (depending on your level of competitiveness) to have the chat on in order to succeed. Now, this isn’t always the case, however, good communication can certainly bring victory. Obviously the problem doesn’t lie with the games themselves, but with the overall childishness that goes on.

      Thanks for commenting and please keep reading and sharing the blog!

  2. What is unfortunate is that the current gen has been following a disturbing trend of giving players even less story and focusing a majority of the game solely on multiplayer combat experience.

    Look at Battlefront. I’ll be the first to admit that the gameplay trailer looked thrilling with all the frills and epic ness of the battle took place on-screen. Realistically, though…how long can that maintain your focus? Is that experience worth the 60 dollar price tag? It’s difficult to say.

    With games like this, or Evolve, or Titanfall…they all could have thrilling engrossing campaigns and I probably would’ve hurled my precious money at them. But when you remove not only an engrossing story, but even the player agency? Sorry, but I’m too old to be mindlessly shooting things without merit.

    I won’t riot, but I will have to respectfully disagree about TLOU. Its not my favorite game, but it was certainly one of the best of the last 10 years in my opinion.

    • Quick answer regarding TLOU: I totally agree. It is one of the better games of the last and even current gen consoles. I just don’t think it lived up to the level set by fan-boy/Sony hype. Still great across all planes.

      So far as the rest of your comment goes: You’re right. Selling stripped down games that are 100% gameplay are definitely going to have to fight for their market share.

      The one thing I do find refreshing about the games: Evolve, Battlefront, CoD (to a lesser extent) is even thought they are completely online and lack any kind of coherent story (or any store at all, for that matter) at least they are honest about what they are.

      Now, I’m not saying that completely redeems their abhorrent lack of anything that decisive, at least they aren’t pretending to be something they are.

      Take the Assassin’s Creed franchise:

      The single-player experience rangers from blase to stellar. But when they started tacking on all of the multiplayer experiences, the overall quality was lost. Up to and including the play-ability of the MP experience.

      Do I think that these stand-alone MP games are worth the 60-70$ Certainly not.

      I thought I had a “but” moment, but it turns out that I find it difficult to disagree with your logic.

      Thanks for commenting and reading. Please keep coming back and sharing.

      – The Ego

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s